Pipeline too close to home for co-op

Lil Cameron had the feeling something was up when she saw surveyors out on Government Street on Wednesday.

That was followed on Thursday morning in the same area by a crew using unmarked vehicles. They were spray painting orange blotches every few feet on the ivy covering the concrete retaining wall that borders the Halston Hills Housing Co-operative where she lives.

Cameron approached City of Burnaby workers who were working on a fire hydrant nearby and asked what was going on at the wall. “They said, ‘It’s not us, it’s Kinder Morgan.’ “

Read more…

Promise and peril in Trans Mountain pipeline ambitions through B.C. mainland

Jeff Lewis

BURNABY, B.C. • Two suburban roads lay bare the promise and peril of a proposed $5.4-billion expansion to Kinder Morgan Canada Inc.’s Trans Mountain pipeline through the densely populated Lower Mainland.

Kinder Morgan’s pipeline ambitions on West Coast raises oil tanker concerns

VANCOUVER • An inky-blue dawn breaks across Burrard Inlet as the oil tanker British Beech glides into view. On the bridge of the tugboat Raven, captain Don Westmoreland, 59, peers at a video monitor that registers the vessel’s bearing and speed. “That’s our ship right there,” he says.

At the corner of Schooner Street and United Boulevard in the Vancouver suburb of Coquitlam, a 24-inch pipeline cuts under the road, past a Starbucks and a Triple O’s burger franchise, before diving under the Fraser River.

In 2002, Kinder Morgan threaded a 1,300-metre section of the pipeline under the road after seismic tests revealed soil along the river bank, where the pipeline had earlier been moved to accommodate a Home Depot, was subject to “liquefaction,” which made it unstable.

It’s an example, said Greg Toth, senior director with the Trans Mountain expansion, of modern pipeline construction techniques in action. “You can thread [a length of pipeline] down a street, put a stake in the ground and come up within a metre of that stake,” he said in an interview at the company’s Calgary office.

A rupture five years later of a transfer line on the Trans Mountain system pierced by a contractor’s excavator — that sprayed 11 houses with a geyser of crude oil along Inlet Drive in nearby Burnaby — underscores the flipside of such precision.

The two episodes shine a light on the urban geography the Canadian arm of the Houston-based pipeline company faces as it looks to more than double capacity on its Edmonton-to-Vancouver pipeline to 890,000 barrels per day, from 300,000 barrels today.

Burnaby accounts for 4% of the land area of Metro Vancouver, but about 10% of the region’s population. It is the third-most populated urban centre in British Columbia, according to the municipal website.


Through pristine Jasper Park, Kinder Morgan goes full-speed on Trans Mountain pipeline expansion

Energy giants Suncor, Kinder Morgan, butt heads over Trans Mountain pipeline fees

Kinder Morgan ups stakes in pipeline fight with Trans Mountain expansion

The city’s community gardens, elementary schools and multimillion-dollar homes stand in sharp contrast to the largely rural landscape the expanded pipeline would traverse next door in Alberta.

The proposed expansion represents a “massive intrusion” into Burnaby, said Kennedy Stewart, the NDP MP for Burnaby-Douglas whose constituency includes Kinder Morgan’s Westridge dock and terminal facilities.

On a recent afternoon, he drove through a labyrinth of suburban streets within sight of Chevron Corp.’s refinery, which employs 400 people, pointing to where the existing pipeline passes close to homes and schools. In some areas the 24-inch diametre pipeline is marked by a painted stripe on the pavement. In others, a yellow utility sign sticks up from the ground.

“People are very concerned about their primary investments, which is their property,” Mr. Stewart said. Burnaby has grown to such a degree that “if the pipeline goes along the existing right-of-way there will be no choice but to expropriate” land, he said.

Jeff Lewis/National PostThe proposed expansion represents a “massive intrusion” into Burnaby, said Kennedy Stewart, the NDP MP for Burnaby-Douglas whose constituency includes Kinder Morgan’s Westridge dock and terminal facilities.
The term is “contentious,” he acknowledges. But “property owners need to know this stuff, because once the bulldozers are at your front door it’s too late to do anything.”

Kinder Morgan, in a project information guide, says it has agreements in place with landowners along the proposed route from Edmonton, where the pipeline begins, to its terminus at Burnaby, who “have allowed Trans Mountain to build and operate the existing pipeline.”

The order-in-council issued in 1951 by Parliament, in addition to approving the original construction, included permission to expand the pipeline — known as “multi-pipeline” rights. “That’s really not what we’re hanging our hat on” when it comes to selecting a route, Mr. Toth said.

Property owners need to know this stuff, because once the bulldozers are at your front door it’s too late to do anything
Instead, he said, company officials are meeting with the B.C. Ministry of Transport, BC Hydro and those with existing linear rights-of-way to determine alternative routing options where new buildings obstruct the pipeline’s path. “We will alter our construction practices to fit the space,” Mr. Toth said.

The expansion entails building two new, 30-inch diametre transfer pipelines from the Burnaby storage terminal to the Westridge dock, where volumes are loaded onto tankers for export.

It was a similar pipeline that workers punctured in 2007 when excavating a trench to replace a storm sewer line. No explosions, fires or injuries were reported, but roughly 250 residents voluntarily left their homes, according to the Transportation Safety Board of Canada report into the incident. Some of the nearly 1,500 barrels of crude spilled made it into Burrard Inlet. The geyser spray hit two people.

The report found the pipeline was not accurately identified on design drawings that dated to 1957. Kinder Morgan exacerbated the spill by closing the wrong valve on the system, the report said.

Burnaby Mayor Derek Corrigan recalls the spill well. It happened on his watch.

“To be put in a position like that as a municipality that we had to react with our fire department, our police, paying overtime, in order to try and prevent this from becoming an even worse disaster, you have to question whether these kinds of projects are reasonable to put on a dense, urban area,” he said in an interview.

This is the second story in a three-part series.

Aging pipeline is worrisome


Dear Editor:

I would like to express my concerns with the existing Kinder Morgan oil pipeline. Every pipeline has a service life.

In other words, they do not operate safely forever.

The existing line was installed approximately 60 years ago. Materials and installation specifications were very different compared to today’s standards. The coating on this line is probably coal tar enamel and is susceptible to disbonding over time. This exposes the steel which is exposed to moisture, chlorides, etc., and corrosion is inevitable.

By the way, coal tar enamel contains asbestos. Steel pipe in the ground will corrode despite cathodic protection.

C.S.A. and Oil and Gas Commission standards require regular testing to determine the integrity of buried pipelines. External corrosion can be identified by close interval surveys, current mapping and most importantly, external corrosion direct assessment, which is recommended by the National Association of Corrosion Engineers.

Oil pipelines are susceptible to internal corrosion. Regulations require assessment of the integrity of the inside of the pipe which requires the insertion of a device called a “pig” that detects internal corrosion, dents, metal thickness and other anomalies. New pipelines have devices called line breaks, which shut down a line if there is a drop in pressure, not the case with the Inlet Drive leak.

Do you think that Kinder Morgan has done their due diligence in testing? Because enforcement of regulations in Canada is almost nonexistent. In defence of the commission, they are badly understaffed.

In short, the existing pipeline should be abandoned. Again, every pipeline has a service life. How long does Kinder Morgan expect this line to operate safely? Rust never sleeps.

Steve Hill, Burnaby

© Copyright (c) Burnaby Now

Read more: http://www.burnabynow.com/technology/Aging+pipeline+worrisome/8068079/story.html#ixzz2NItDA6iz